Proposals call for banks to scrap net-zero targets or temporarily suspend them

Gina Pappano, the shareholder who filed the proposals under the banner InvestNow, a not-for-profit corporation she started to oppose the fossil-fuel divestment movement, told The Logic she was concerned the recent raft of divestment policies at university endowments and pension funds could spread to Canada’s banks and erode financing for the country’s oil and gas sector and harm the broader economy. “The world is going to need oil and gas for a long time to come,” said Pappano, who used to lead market intelligence at TMX Group. “Our argument is if demand is not going down, Canada should be there to supply the demand.”
A swell of shareholder activism in recent years has pushed corporations to bolster their environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices.Every year, investors in publicly listed companies get to file non-binding resolutions and vote on changes they want to see at the firms in which they hold assets. The period of annual meetings at which the voting takes place is broadly known as proxy season.
The number of ESG-related proposals, and in particular those specific to climate, has spiked in recent years. In the U.S. last year, shareholders filed a record 630 resolutions, 316 of which went to a vote and garnered average support of around 30 per cent. Pappano said she felt compelled to express “an alternative message” to what she saw as an attack on the oil and gas sector. “The other side of the argument has never been voiced,” she said. “The banks said they’ve never received anything like this in the past.”
While proposals like the ones Pappano filed are unusual in Canada, they reflect a growing anti-ESG movement percolating in the U.S. among critics who say it’s an ideological movement that threatens economic freedom.
Vocal antagonists to ESG investing, like Tesla founder Elon Musk and Social Capital founder Chamath Palihapitiya, have fuelled the backlash. The biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, who recently announced his run for U.S. president in 2024 launched a “post-ESG” ETF last year focused on oil and gas stocks with backing from PayPal founder Peter Thiel and billionaire hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman. Last month, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis launched a coalition of 18 other Republican governors challenging ESG policies, which have become the norm among large companies and investment funds.
“During our engagements with Canadian companies, we hear that they are scared about the U.S. stuff.”
But Cook said the InvestNow proposals are the first she’s seen in Canada.
Matt Price, executive director of corporate engagement at Investors for Paris Compliance, contended that the proposals are motivated more by ideology than market demand. The As You Sow report calculated just 3.5 per cent average support for anti-ESG proposals last year, which doesn’t meet the threshold in the U.S. for shareholders to resubmit the resolution for a vote the following year.
Despite low shareholder support, anti-ESG proponents have had some success in the U.S.. In December, Pennsylvania-based Vanguard, which manages more than US$7 trillion in assets, quit the Net Zero Asset Managers (NZAM) global alliance following political pressure. The alliance’s umbrella organization — the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, launched by former central banker and Brookfield Asset Management chair Mark Carney—has also faced pushback over criteria some members deemed too stringent.
In Canada, the banks have advised shareholders to vote against Pappano’s anti-divestment proposals. They’ve argued that while they’re committed to addressing climate change and reaching net-zero emissions by 2050, divestment is not part of their transition plans. Rather, their approach is to continue financing oil and gas companies to help them decarbonize.
Certainly, Canada’s banks aren’t showing signs of exiting the fossil-fuel business. RBC was the sector’s largest financier last year, providing over US$42 billion, up from about US$40.4 billion the year before, according to the annual Banking on Climate Chaos report. Both Scotiabank and TD cracked the top 10 for their fossil fuel financing, contributing US$29.5 billion and US$29 billion, respectively.
Cook, meanwhile, said the vote count on anti-ESG proposals are also instructive, and that the low support for InvestNow’s proposal so far is a useful gauge of investor sentiment. “It reflects a lot of investor consensus that banks have an important role to play in the global energy transition,” she said, “and we’re moving in the wrong direction if we ask banks to continue to finance Canada’s oil and gas sector.”
This section is powered by The Logic. The Logic is Canada’s preeminent tech and business newsroom. For more news, visit thelogic.co.
Share This:





CDN NEWS |
US NEWS



























