Sign Up for FREE Daily Energy News
canada flag CDN NEWS  |  us flag US NEWS  | TIMELY. FOCUSED. RELEVANT. FREE
  • Stay Connected
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • youtube2
BREAKING NEWS:
Copper Tip Energy Services
WEC - Western Engineered Containment


Connacher Announces Q1 2019 Results


These translations are done via Google Translate

CALGARYMay 29, 2019 /CNW/ – Connacher Oil and Gas Limited (“Connacher” or the “Company”) announces its financial and operating results for the quarter-ended March 31, 2019 (all amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted).

Q1 2019 Highlights

Financial

  • Q1 2019 revenue, net of royalties, increased to $53.6 million (Q1 2018 – $33.9 million), primarily due to higher crude oil benchmark pricing, partially offset by lower sales volumes
  • In Q1 2019, the Company recorded additional income and revenue related to the forfeited Plan Sponsorship deposit and curtailment, which totaled $13.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively. In previous periods, other income related to interest income
  • Q1 2019 adjusted EBITDA increased to $7.3 million (Q1 2018 – adjusted EBITDA deficit of $16.4 million), primarily due to higher revenue, net of royalties
  • Q1 2019 funds flow increased to $10.4 million (Q1 2018 – used of $28.8 million), primarily due to a higher adjusted EBITDA
  • In Q1 2019, the Company generated net earnings of $3.3 million (Q1 2018 – net loss of $57.2 million), primarily due to a higher adjusted EBITDA and foreign exchange gains
  • Q1 2019 capital expenditures totaled $1.6 million (Q1 2018 – $5.3 million) and focused primarily on well servicing required to restore and maintain production. In Q1 2018, capital expenditures included amounts related to the drilling of future infill wells
  • The Company exited Q1 2019 with a cash balance of $57.5 million (including restricted cash of $7.1 million) (Q4 2018 – $54.3 million)

Operational

  • Q1 2019 production decreased 15% to 10,754 bbl/d (Q1 2018 – 12,670 bbl/d), primarily due to the Company’s strategic decision to reduce bitumen production in the low commodity price environment in Q4 2018. As crude oil benchmark pricing improved through Q1 2019, the Company restored bitumen production
  • In Q1 2019, blending costs decreased 25% to $12.2 million (Q1 2018 – $16.2 million), primarily due to lower diluent benchmark pricing and lower diluent volumes associated with reduced bitumen production
  • Q1 2019 transportation and handling costs increased 16% to $11.6 million (Q1 2018 – $10.0 million), primarily due to higher transportation costs, partially offset by the lower sales volumes

Q1 2019 Financial Highlights

FINANCIAL (1)

Q1 2019

Q1 2018

Revenue, net of royalties

$53,577

$33,855

Other income

2,171

33

Adjusted EBITDA (2)

7,341

(16,387)

Net earnings (loss)

3,260

(57,166)

Basic per share

0.12

(2.02)

Diluted per share

0.12

(2.02)

Funds flow (used) (3)

10,414

(28,775)

Capital expenditures

1,611

5,313

Cash on hand (4)

57,461

54,260

Working capital deficiency

(334,756)

(291,829)

Shareholders’ equity

(296,210)

(94,028)

(1)

($ 000) except per share amounts

(2)

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and is defined in the “Advisory Section” of the Q1 2019 MD&A and is reconciled to net loss under “Reconciliations of Net Earnings (Loss) to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Bitumen Netback”

(3)

Funds used is a non-GAAP measure and is defined in the “Advisory Section” of the Q1 2019 MD&A and is reconciled to cash flow from operating activities under “Reconciliations of Cash Flow From (Used in) Operating Activities to Funds Flow (Used)”

(4)

Balance includes restricted cash of $7.1 million, pursuant to the terms of the Initial Order granted in the Company’s CCAA proceeding before the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial Centre of Calgary

Q1 2019 Operational Highlights

OPERATIONAL

Q1 2019

Q1 2018

Average benchmark prices

WTI (US$/bbl)

$54.81

$62.87

WTI ($/bbl)

72.48

79.64

Heavy oil differential (US$/bbl)

(12.23)

(24.28)

WCS ($/bbl)

56.31

48.89

$/US$ exchange rate

1.32

1.27

Production and sales volumes (1)

Daily bitumen production (bbl/d)

10,754

12,670

Daily bitumen sales (bbl/d)

10,753

12,649

Bitumen netback ($/bbl) (2)(3)

Dilbit sales

$47.82

$25.67

Blending of products sold

(4.24)

(9.96)

Realized bitumen sales price   

43.58

15.71

Transportation and handling costs

(12.01)

(8.77)

Net realized bitumen sales price

31.57

6.94

Royalties

(0.87)

(0.17)

Net bitumen revenue price

30.70

6.77

Production and operating expenses

(19.34)

(16.89)

Bitumen netback

$11.37

$(10.12)

(1)

The Company’s bitumen sales and production volumes differ due to changes in inventory and product losses

(2)

A non-GAAP measure which is defined in the “Advisory Section” of the Q1 2019 MD&A. Bitumen netback is reconciled to net loss under “Reconciliations of Net Earnings (Loss) to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Bitumen Netback”. Bitumen netbacks per barrel amounts are calculated by dividing the total amounts presented in the “Bitumen Netback” table on page 11 by bitumen sold volumes as presented in the “Production and Sales Volumes” table on page 10, with the exception of dilbit sales (presented as dilbit sales divided by dilbit sales volume) and diluent costs (presented as the cost of diluent in excess of the dilbit selling price)

(3)

Before risk management contract gains or losses

Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) Proceeding and Status

On March 31, 2016, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) with Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, and certain lenders constituting the “Required Lenders” in respect of US$153.8 million of loans made by the lenders (the “Lenders”) under the credit agreement dated as of May 23, 2014 (as amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time, including as amended pursuant to Amendment No. 1 dated May 8, 2015) (the “Amended Term Loan Facility”). Under the terms of the Forbearance Agreement, the Lenders agreed to, among other things, forbear from exercising enforcement rights and remedies arising from the Company’s failure to pay the cash interest and principal payments due on March 31, 2016 until the earlier of April 30, 2016; the occurrence of an event of default under the Amended Term Loan Facility, unrelated to the failure to pay principal and interest due on March 31, 2016; or the occurrence of a default or breach of representation by the Company under the Forbearance Agreement.

On April 30, 2016, the Company entered into a second forbearance agreement (the “Second Forbearance Agreement”) which extended the forbearance period until May 16, 2016.

On May 17, 2016, the Company sought and obtained creditor protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) pursuant to an order (the “Initial Order”) granted by the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Judicial Centre of Calgary (the “Court”). The Court granted CCAA stay protection for an initial period expiring on June 16, 2016. Since the Initial Order, multiple Court-ordered stay extensions have been obtained, with the most recent extending the stay of proceedings until June 28, 2019 (the “CCAA Stay Period”).

Under the Initial Order, Ernst & Young Inc. was appointed by the Court as the monitor (the “Monitor”).

The CCAA is a federal insolvency statute that allows an insolvent company which owes creditors in excess of $5 million to restructure its business and financial affairs and stays creditors and others from enforcing rights against the insolvent company.

The Initial Order also approved and authorized the Company and the Monitor to conduct a sale and investment solicitation process (the “SISP”), as set out in Schedule “A” to the Initial Order, to identify one or more purchasers and/or investors in the Company’s business and/or property.

As authorized and approved by the Initial Order, the Company secured interim financing in the form of a senior secured debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “Interim Financing Credit Facility” or “DIP”) pursuant to a credit agreement dated as of May 15, 2016 with certain existing lenders (certain of which are or were also significant shareholders of the Company) (the “Interim Lenders”) for up to US$20 million (collectively, the “Total DIP Commitments”), with initial commitments of up to US$11.5 million (the “Initial Commitments”).

On October 26, 2016, the Company entered into a Waiver, Approval, and Modification Agreement (the “First DIP Amendment Agreement”) with its Interim Lenders related to the DIP. Pursuant to the First DIP Amendment Agreement, the Interim Lenders agreed to waive certain limited defaults under the DIP related to the CCAA SISP timelines and advanced to the Company an additional amount of approximately US$5.0 million of the Total DIP Commitments initially authorized by the Court to support the Company’s continuing operations.

On December 16, 2016, the Company entered into a further Approval and Modification Agreement (the “Second DIP Amendment Agreement”) with the Interim Lenders related to the DIP. The Second DIP Amendment Agreement extended the maturity date under the DIP from May 17, 2017 to December 31, 2017and amended certain provisions of the DIP in order to provide the Company with greater flexibility to enter into hedging agreements and other long-term contracts.

On June 27, 2017, the Company entered into Approval and Modification Agreement #3 (the “Third DIP Amendment Agreement”) with the Interim Lenders with respect to the DIP.  The Third DIP Amendment Agreement extended the maturity date of the DIP from December 31, 2017 to January 31, 2018.

On January 30, 2018, the Company received approval from the Court in its proceeding under the CCAA to grant a royalty to Burgess Energy Holdings, L.L.C (“Burgess”) on all of the lands (the “Royalty Lands”) containing bitumen together with the oil sands rights and interests owned by the Company (the “Royalty”) for cash consideration of $43.75 million. Concurrent with the closing of the Royalty transaction, the Company used a portion of the consideration to repay, in full, the US$16.5 million owing under the DIP.

On March 28, 2018, the Court approved the Company’s entry into a Support Agreement (the “Original Support Agreement”) with Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “First Lien Agent”) and certain first lien lenders (the “Consenting First Lien Lenders”) holding in excess of 75% of the principal amount of debt outstanding under the Amended Term Loan Facility and commencement of a new SISP. The Original Support Agreement provided the foundation for the Company’s exit from CCAA protection by securing majority first lien lender support for the commencement of a new sale and investment solicitation process (“SISP”) and the implementation of either a: (i) “Superior Transaction” identified during the new SISP (being a transaction that provides greater than $90 million of cash consideration, excluding existing cash on hand, plus payment of all priority claims and assumption of certain liabilities); or, (ii) pre-negotiated credit bid transaction pursuant to which a newly formed entity on behalf of the first lien lenders (“Newco”) will acquire the assets of the Company (the “Original Credit Bid Transaction”) in the event a Superior Transaction is not identified during the new SISP.

The Original Support Agreement also contains a number of financial and non-financial covenants and restrictions on the Company.

The key features of the Original Credit Bid Transaction included: (i) formation of Newco to acquire all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (ii) assumption by Newco of the Company’s post-CCAA filing trade payables; (iii) offers of employment being made by Newco to all of the Company’s employees; (iv) entry by Newco into a new senior secured facility (the “Newco Senior Secured Facility”); and, (v) distribution of the shares of Newco and the obligation under the Newco Senior Secured Facility to the existing first lien lenders on the terms set out in the Original Support Agreement and related exhibits. The Original Credit Bid Transaction, if implemented, would not provide a recovery to the Company’s stakeholders beyond the existing first lien lenders and creditors with claims that rank in priority to the first lien lenders.

On August 2, 2018, the Company announced that East River Oil and Gas Ltd. (the “Plan Sponsor”) had been selected as the “Successful Bidder” pursuant to the SISP conducted in the Company’s proceeding under the CCAA.

The Company and the Plan Sponsor entered into a CCAA Acquisition and Plan Sponsorship Agreement dated August 2, 2018 (the “Plan Sponsorship Agreement”) pursuant to which the Plan Sponsor would acquire the Company upon and subject to the terms and conditions set out in the Plan Sponsorship Agreement under a plan of compromise and arrangement (the “2018 CCAA Plan”) under the CCAA. The Plan Sponsorship Agreement also provided that in the event that, among other things, the 2018 CCAA Plan was not approved by the Company’s creditors or the Court, or if the Company and the Plan Sponsor jointly determined that it is no longer viable to implement the transactions contemplated by the 2018 CCAA Plan, the Plan Sponsor would acquire substantially all of the assets of the Company pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated August 2, 2018 (“Sale Agreement”).

On October 4, 2018, the Court granted an order (the “Sanction Order”) approving and sanctioning the 2018 CCAA Plan. In the Sanction Order, the Court also extended the CCAA Stay Period to the earlier of (i) the filing of the Monitor’s certificate (as defined in the Sanction Order) and (ii) January 31, 2019.

On November 7, 2018, the Plan Sponsor notified the Company that, since not all of the PRC Approvals (as defined in the Plan Sponsorship Agreement) would be obtained by November 15, 2018, the Plan Sponsor was exercising its first pre-negotiated right under the Plan Sponsorship Agreement to extend the “Outside Date” under the Plan Sponsorship Agreement and “Outside Date for Closing” under the Sale Agreement, in each case to December 15, 2018. The Plan Sponsor paid an Additional Deposit (as defined in the Plan Sponsorship Agreement) to the Monitor on November 15, 2018.

On December 18, 2018, the Company and the Plan Sponsor, with the consent of the Consenting First Lien Lenders, as defined in the 2018 CCAA Plan, and in consultation with the Monitor, agreed to amend the “Outside Date” under the Plan Sponsorship Agreement and “Outside Date for Closing” under the Sale Agreement, in each case to January 31, 2019.

On January 25, 2019, the Company obtained an order from the Court extending the period of the Court-ordered stay of proceedings against the Company under the CCAA until the earlier of (i) the filing of the Monitor’s certificate under the Plan and (ii) March 15, 2019.

On February 1, 2019, the Company and the Plan Sponsor entered into an agreement (the “Outside Date Amending Agreement No. 2”) which further amended the “Outside Date” under the Plan Sponsorship Agreement and “Outside Date for Closing” under the Sale Agreement, in each case to March 29, 2019, conditional upon the Plan Sponsor delivering to the Monitor, in trust for the Company, a further deposit in the amount of $2 million by February 15, 2019 which was treated as an “Additional Deposit” pursuant to the terms of the Plan Sponsorship Agreement and the Sale Agreement. The parties agreed that if such payment was not received by the Monitor by February 15, 2019, the “Outside Date” would be deemed to be February 15, 2019. Further, the Plan Sponsor agreed that the $13.5 million in previously paid deposits being held by the Monitor were immediately forfeited to the Company, but would be credited towards a transaction if timely completed by the Plan Sponsor.

The Plan Sponsor failed to deliver the further $2 million deposit required by the Outside Date Amending Agreement No. 2, and failed to complete a transaction by February 15, 2019. On February 16, 2019, with the consent of the Consenting First Lien Lenders and in consultation with the Monitor, the Company exercised its right to terminate the Plan Sponsorship Agreement pursuant to the terms of that agreement. As a result, the Monitor paid over to the Company the forfeited deposits in the aggregate amount of $13,500,000.

As a result of the termination of the Plan Sponsorship Agreement, under the terms of the Original Support Agreement, the First Lien Agent and Consenting First Lien Lenders were required to promptly take steps to implement the Original Credit Bid Transaction.

On March 4, 2019, the Company, the First Lien Agent and the Consenting First Lien Lenders entered into the Support Agreement Amending Agreement, which deferred the “Credit Bid Trigger Date” to March 8, 2019 and amended the definition of “Outside Date” under the Original Support Agreement to be May 31, 2019 or such other dates as the Majority Consenting First Lien Lenders (as defined in the Original Support Agreement) and the Company may agree.

Subsequent to the execution of the Support Agreement Amending Agreement, the Company and the Majority Consenting First Lien Lenders agreed to further defer the “Credit Bid Trigger Date” to May 16, 2019 and the “Outside Date” under the Original Support Agreement to June 28, 2019, to provide additional time for the parties to continue their discussions on potential amendments to the structure and terms of the Original Credit Bid Transaction.

On May 6, 2019, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Support Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Support Agreement”) with the First Lien Agent and the Consenting First Lien Lenders. In addition, on May 16, 2019, the Court, among other things: approved the Company’s entry into the Amended and Restated Support Agreement; accepted the filing by the Company of a CCAA Plan of Compromise and Arrangement as contemplated by the Amended and Restated Support Agreement and attached at Schedule “C” thereto (the “2019 CCAA Plan”); approved a key employee retention plan; and authorized the Company to call meetings of its creditors to consider and vote on the 2019 CCAA Plan (the “Creditors’ Meeting Order”).

The Amended and Restated Support Agreement amends the Original Support Agreement and contemplates a transaction whereby the first lien lenders under the First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien Lenders”) will become the owners of the Company’s business either through (i) an exchange of a portion of the obligations under the First Lien Credit Agreement (the “First Lien Debt”) for new senior secured debt of the Company and all of the Company’s equity, which shall be effected by way of the 2019 CCAA Plan and on the terms set out in the Plan Term Sheet (the “Plan Term Sheet”) attached as Schedule “B” to the Amended and Restated Support Agreement (the “Plan Transaction”), or (ii) in the event that the 2019 CCAA Plan is not approved by the Company’s creditors or the Court, or if the Company and the Consenting First Lien Lenders jointly determine that it is no longer viable to implement the Plan Transaction (each a “CCAA Plan Termination Event”), the First Lien Agent, on behalf of the First Lien Lenders, shall cause a new company to be formed (the “Credit Bid Purchaser”) to credit bid a portion of the First Lien Debt for all or substantially all of the Company’s property and assets which shall be effected by way of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “PSA”) substantially in the form attached as Schedule “E” to the Amended and Restated Support Agreement and on the terms set out in the Credit Bid Term Sheet (the “Credit Bid Term Sheet”) attached as Schedule “D” to the Amended and Restated Support Agreement (the “Credit Bid Transaction”).

The Plan Transaction includes the following transactions whereby, among other things, pursuant to and in accordance with the 2019 CCAA Plan:

  • all Affected Claims (as defined in the 2019 CCAA Plan) will be compromised and extinguished;
  • a portion of the Company’s cash-on-hand shall be used to (i) satisfy in full all claims which rank pari passuwith or in priority to the First Lien Debt, and (ii) establish an administrative reserve fund;
  • each Tranche A Lender under the First Lien Credit Agreement shall receive in respect of the principal amount of its Tranche A Loans, its pro rata share of the obligations under a new senior secured term facility on the key terms set out in the Plan Term Sheet;
  • each Tranche A Lender and Tranche B Lender shall receive in respect of, in the case of a Tranche A Lender, the accrued interest on its Tranche A Loans, and, in the case of a Tranche B Lender, the principal and accrued interest of its Tranche B Loans, its pro rata share of voting common shares of a new class of shares of the Company, which, immediately following issuance, will constitute all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company; and
  • a portion of the Company’s cash-on-hand shall be used to establish a general creditor pool in the aggregate amount of $500,000 (plus the amount required to satisfy “Convenience Class Claims” under the 2019 CCAA Plan) which shall be distributed to the Affected Creditors (as defined in the 2019 CCAA Plan) in accordance with the 2019 CCAA Plan.

In the event that a CCAA Plan Termination Event occurs, subject to the terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated Support Agreement and PSA, the Credit Bid Purchaser will acquire all or substantially all of the property and assets of the Company in exchange for a portion of the First Lien Debt. If the Credit Bid Transaction occurs, the Company does not expect any value will accrue to any of the Company’s creditors (other than the First Lien Lenders and those creditors with claims that rank pari passu with or in priority to the First Lien Debt) and, subject to approval by the Court, the Company’s property and assets will be transferred to the Credit Bid Purchaser free and clear of all claims.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Support Agreement, the Company will put in place a key employee retention plan (the “Credit Bid KERP”) for certain of the Company’s key employees to incentivize them to remain with the Company through successful completion of the Plan Transaction or Credit-Bid Transaction and beyond emergence from CCAA. The Credit Bid KERP is an important component of the parties’ support under the Amended and Restated Support Agreement.

The Amended and Restated Support Agreement, including the Plan Transaction or Credit Bid Transaction, are subject to certain conditions precedent as set out in the Amended and Restated Support Agreement, the Plan Term Sheet, the 2019 CCAA Plan, the Credit Bid Term Sheet and PSA, as applicable, including receipt of certain regulatory approvals and, in the case of the 2019 CCAA Plan, receipt of requisite creditor approval and Court sanction. The Amended and Restated Support Agreement, the Plan Term Sheet, the 2019 CCAA Plan, the Credit Bid Term Sheet and PSA also contain other terms and conditions customary for transactions of this nature, including typical “fiduciary out” terms that would permit the Company, under certain circumstances, to pursue a superior transaction.

The above description is a summary only and is subject to the terms of the definitive Amended and Restated Support Agreement, including the Plan Term Sheet, Credit Bid Term Sheet, 2019 CCAA Plan and PSA, as applicable. The material terms of the Amended and Restated Support Agreement, the Plan Term Sheet, the 2019 CCAA Plan, the Credit Bid Term Sheet and PSA are contained in the Amended and Restated Support Agreement, the Plan Term Sheet, the 2019 CCAA Plan, the Credit Bid Term Sheet and PSA, copies of which are available on the website of the Court-appointed Monitor of the Company in the CCAA proceeding at www.ey.com/ca/connacheroilandgas and are filed under the Company’s profile on www.sedar.com.

As the Company’s creditors will not be paid in full under the 2019 CCAA Plan, no value will accrue to the Company’s existing shareholders as a result of the implementation of the 2019 CCAA Plan and the outstanding shares and options of the Company will be cancelled for no consideration and without any vote of the existing shareholders.

As at March 31, 2019, in connection with the CCAA proceeding, the Company identified the following obligations subject to potential compromise:

  (Canadian dollars in thousands)

  Current and long-term portions of Amended Term Loan Facility

$225,653

  Interest payable on Amended Term Loan Facility

94,040

  Convertible Notes

46,500

  Interest payable on Convertible Notes

31,569

  Trade and accrued liabilities

18,653

  Total liabilities subject to compromise

$416,415

The liabilities that are not subject to the CCAA proceeding are excluded from the liabilities subject to potential compromise and include certain non-restructuring liabilities incurred subsequent to May 17, 2016.

About Connacher

Connacher is a Calgary-based in situ oil sands developer, producer, and marketer of bitumen. The Company’s principal asset is a 100 per cent interest in the Company’s Great Divide oil sands leases near Fort McMurray, Alberta. The Company operates two steam-assisted gravity drainage facilities located on these leases.



Share This:



More News Articles


GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE