CDN NEWS | 
US NEWS 
In June, the Carney government passed Bill C-5 to purportedly eliminate the gridlock that prevents the construction of major energy infrastructure. But the government’s first list of projects to get the Bill C-5 treatment did not include any oil or gas pipelines…
Kenneth Green
Earlier this month, when Premier Danielle Smith announced her government, in conjunction with major players in the oilsands, would propose a pipeline to carry Alberta’s products to tidewater off Canada’s West Coast, she may have called the Carney government’s bluff (and the bluff of any other government that might be bluffing about pipelines).
In June, the Carney government passed Bill C-5 to purportedly eliminate the gridlock that prevents the construction of major energy infrastructure. But the government’s first list of projects to get the Bill C-5 treatment did not include any oil or gas pipelines (which was no surprise, in light of Canada’s hostile regulatory landscape that deters private-sector companies from investing time and money). In response to Smith’s announcement, federal Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson said any proposal for a pipeline must include “meaningful consultations with Indigenous rights holders” and close partnerships with “all affected jurisdictions.”
Eby changes his tune
Meanwhile, in B.C., one of those “affected jurisdictions,” Premier David Eby is essentially denying that Smith’s proposal has significant private-sector support, implying it will require federal spending and that it’s a “direct threat to the kind of economy we are trying to build.” And yet, back in June, Eby said he was open to the idea of another privately-funded pipeline to tidewater in northern B.C., noting only that he doesn’t support “tens of billions of dollars in federal subsidy going to build this new pipeline when we already own a pipeline that empties into British Columbia,” referring to the Trans Mountain pipeline. In other words, it sounds like Eby has changed his tune.
In Quebec, Premier François Legault said in February that his government might be open to a proposed oil pipeline (Energy East) from Alberta — “For the moment, there is no project on the table,” he said. “If there is a project on the table, we will look at it.” Fast-forward to today. When asked about Smith’s proposal, leader of the Bloc Quebecois, Yves-François Blanchet (a close ally of Legault’s), said “Let’s imagine that Quebec is an independent and free country. We will go on the world stage to say that Alberta is destroying the environment of the whole planet.”
Same old story
Clearly, while the federal government and key provincial governments have implied they’re open to new pipelines (albeit, under an ever-changing roster of conditions), Premier Smith’s proposal has seemingly revealed the truth. They sound like the same implacable opponents of oil and gas development, in submission to the international climate change movement’s zero-tolerance policy for fossil fuels, that have dominated in Canada for a decade.
Kenneth Green is a senior fellow at the Fraser Institute.
Share This:
