Natural gas from Canada can help reduce world emissions and improve energy security
Follow CEC on Linkedin CEC Linkedin
Follow CEC on Facebook CEC Facebook
Follow CEC on Twitter CEC Twitter
Coal use around the world is rising in what the head of the International Energy Agency (IEA) calls “a sobering reality check” for targets to reduce emissions.
Against that backdrop global demand for liquified natural gas (LNG) is soaring, in part because it can help displace coal power and reduce emissions by half – or more, if the LNG comes from Canada.
There are now 2,449 coal-fired power plants operating around the world, according to Global Energy Monitor. Another 189 are under construction and a further 292 in “pre-construction,” or planned for the near future.
“This is a major challenge,” Birol said. “In particular from the perspective of emerging and developing countries, where you see coal might be playing a critical role in providing electricity and keeping the affordability of electricity prices.”
A solution is LNG, or the global trade of natural gas by ocean tanker.
Even with COVID lockdowns, world LNG demand rose to 380 million tonnes in 2021 from 360 million tonnes in 2020, according to Shell’s latest report. That’s expected to nearly double to cross 700 million tonnes by 2040.
Using natural gas instead of coal to fuel power plants reduces emissions by about 50 per cent on average, the IEA says.
LNG from Canada can deliver an even bigger decrease, reducing emissions by up to 62 per cent, according to a 2020 study published in the Journal for Cleaner Production.
That’s in part because Canada’s LNG projects are expected to have the lowest emissions intensity – or emissions per unit of LNG – in the world.
The LNG Canada project now under construction, for example, is expected to have emissions of 0.15 per cent CO2 per tonne of LNG, less than half the global average of 0.35 per cent, according to Oxford Energy Institute.
Proposed B.C. LNG projects that would use more hydroelectricity from the province’s power grid are expected to have even lower emissions intensity: 0.08 per cent for Indigenous-led Cedar LNG, and 0.03 per cent for Woodfibre LNG.
“We do have cheap, plentiful supplies of natural gas both in northeast B.C. and throughout Alberta, and we do have shorter shipping distances to Asia,” says Ian Archer, associate director of gas, power and climate solutions with S&P Global.
“But what we have is very limited infrastructure to connect those two points.”
Share This:
COMMENTARY: Activists Suddenly Care About LNG Investors