Sign Up for FREE Daily Energy News
canada flag CDN NEWS  |  us flag US NEWS  | TIMELY. FOCUSED. RELEVANT. FREE
  • Stay Connected
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • youtube2
BREAKING NEWS:
WEC - Western Engineered Containment
WEC - Western Engineered Containment


Colorado oil tank blast kills worker, spurs safety questions

DENVER — An oil tank explosion in northern Colorado killed a worker and burned three others, shooting up flames just miles away from an unrelated gas blast last month and prompting fresh questions about safety in one of Colorado’s largest industries — oil and gas extraction.

The fire flared Thursday when the workers completed upgrades to an oil tank battery, which is a collection of tanks that receive crude oil production from a well.

Anadarko Petroleum Co. said the facility in Mead, about 40 miles (64 kilometres) north of Denver, was not in service and the fire was under investigation.

The company also owns a well connected to a home explosion that killed two people in Firestone, a city a few miles from Mead. The April 17 blast was traced to a leaky well.

Anadarko says it will permanently shut down the Firestone well and two others in the neighbourhood. The pipeline was thought to be out of service, but investigators say it was still connected to a well near the home.

Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, a former petroleum geologist, said Friday that the two explosions apparently were not related. State agencies and the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration were investigating the latest blast, he said.

“We will continue to work closely with investigating agencies and the industry to better understand the cause of this accident and take any necessary action to ensure that this doesn’t happen again,” Hickenlooper said.

Democratic state Rep. Mike Foote said the industry and government “have an obligation to treat these incidents not as isolated or freak accidents.”

The Sierra Club called for Anadarko to shutter all of its operations while state and federal authorities conduct a comprehensive review. The company did not respond.

A third safety accident related to the energy industry happened Thursday in northeast Colorado, near the Nebraska border. A leak of natural gas was discovered from an underground storage facility.

The leak occurred in a well that injects and withdraws gas from the facility owned by East Cheyenne Gas Storage. Logan County called all residents who live within 2 miles of the well and urged them to evacuate.

There were no injuries from the storage-tank leak.

___

Associated Press writers James Anderson and Nicholas Riccardi contributed to this report.

Kristen Wyatt, The Associated Press

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

US rig count rises 7 this week to 908; Colorado up 5

HOUSTON — The number of rigs exploring for oil and natural gas in the U.S. rose by seven this week to 908.

A year ago, 404 rigs were active.

Houston oilfield services company Baker Hughes said Friday that 722 rigs sought oil and 185 explored for natural gas this week. One was listed as miscellaneous.

Colorado added five rigs while Alaska, New Mexico, North Dakota and Oklahoma each gained one.

Texas lost one rig.

Arkansas, California, Kansas, Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming were all unchanged.

The U.S. rig count peaked at 4,530 in 1981. It bottomed out last May at 404.

The Associated Press

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

The Latest: Colorado lawmakers urge probe of fatal oil blast

GREELEY, Colo. — The Latest on a fatal oil tank fire in northern Colorado (all times local):

11:35 a.m.

Two Colorado lawmakers are calling on the owner of an oil tank facility that was the scene of a fatal explosion to co-operate with state investigators to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

House Majority Leader KC Becker and Rep. Mike Foote, both Democrats, said Friday that the fire that killed one worker and injured three others was unacceptable — especially coming after a fatal house explosion in the region blamed on a natural gas pipe leak.

Foote says the industry and government “have an obligation to treat these incidents not as isolated or freak accidents.”

Anadarko Petroleum Co. says it’s investigating what caused Thursday’s blast in Mead, about 40 miles (64 kilometres) north of Denver.

An April 17 house explosion in nearby Firestone killed two people. Investigators blamed it on natural gas from a severed pipeline linked to an Anadarko-owned well.

___

11:15 a.m.

The oil tank battery that caught fire Thursday in Mead was not in operation when it caught fire Thursday, killing one and injuring three.

That’s according to the owner of the site, Anadarko Petroleum Company.

The company has not identified the workers. Anadarko says they were “finishing projects associated with a facility upgrade.” The company didn’t elaborate.

Anadarko says it is investigating what caused the fire.

An oil tank battery is a collection of tanks that receive crude oil production from a well.

___

10:15 a.m.

Colorado’s governor says it’s too soon for the state to take any action in response to a fatal oil tank explosion in Thursday.

The explosion at an oil tank battery in Mead killed one worker and injured three more.

Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper is resisting calls from an environmental group to temporarily shut down all Colorado gas wells owned by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. The company owns the site of Thursday’s explosion and another well that caused a fatal home explosion in Firestone. Two people were killed in that blast.

Hickenlooper told reporters Friday that it was too early for any government response pending an investigation into the Mead incident. He said, “Let’s see what happened first.”

The victims of the Mead explosion have not yet been named.

An oil tank battery is a collection of tanks that receive crude oil production from a well.

___

8 a.m.

A fatal oil tank battery fire in northern Colorado appears to be unrelated to a nearby home explosion last month caused by a leaky gas line.

Thursday’s blast in Mead killed one person and injured three others. All were working on a battery at the site owned by Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.

The explosion happened less than 4 miles away from the Firestone neighbourhood where an April 17 explosion killed two people. Investigators blamed that explosion on natural gas from a severed pipeline. Anadarko owns that well, too.

The Weld County Sheriff’s Department tells The Denver Channel that the two deadly incidents aren’t related.

Cpl. Matt Turner with the Weld County Sheriff’s Office tells the station that Thursday’s blast was “a completely separate incident all together.”

Thursday victims haven’t been identified.

The Associated Press



GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Stable gas prices expected to boost Memorial Day road trips

Stable gasoline prices are expected to fuel a slight increase in long trips this Memorial Day weekend.
The AAA auto club predicts that 39 million Americans will make a trip of at least 50 miles this weekend, up 2.7 per cent from the same holiday last …

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Greenfields Petroleum Corporation Announces Financial Results and Operating Highlights for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

FOR: GREENFIELDS PETROLEUM CORPORATION
TSX VENTURE SYMBOL: GNF

Date issue: May 26, 2017
Time in: 5:30 PM e

Attention:

HOUSTON, TEXAS–(Marketwired – May 26, 2017) – Greenfields Petroleum
Corporation (the “Company” or “Greenfields”) (TSX VENTURE:GNF), an independent
exploration and production company with producing assets in Azerbaijan,
announces its financial results and operating highlights for the first quarter
of 2017. Selected financial and operational information is set out below and
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s complete financial statements
as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2017, with the notes thereto and
related management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), which can be found on
Greenfields’ website at www.Greenfields-Petroleum.com and on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com. Except as otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts referenced
herein are expressed in United States dollars.

First Quarter 2017 Financial Results and Operating Highlights

/T/

— Bahar Energy Limited’s (“BEL”) entitlement sales volumes averaged 709

bbl/d for crude oil and 17,296 mcf/d for natural gas or 3,591 boe/d in
the first quarter 2017, which represents 83.6% of the gross entitlement
volumes delivered to the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan (“SOCAR”).
As compared to the same quarter in 2016, average entitlement sales
volumes decreased 20% for oil, increased 27% for natural gas and
increased 14% for boe/d, which represented 83.2% of gross entitlement
volumes in the first quarter 2016. Gross entitlement volumes for both
years include 10% compensatory petroleum delivered to SOCAR at no
charge.

— For the first quarter 2017, BEL realized an average oil price of $48.20

per barrel. This reflects an increase from $30.84 per barrel for the
same period in 2016. BEL realized a natural gas price of $3.96 per mcf
for 2017 and 2016, which was a contractually constant fixed price.

— For the first quarter 2017, the Company realized a loss of $1.4 million

which represents a loss per share (basic and diluted) of $0.01. In
comparison, for the same period in 2016, the Company realized a net loss
of $3.6 million with a loss per share (basic and diluted) of $0.16.

/T/

Operating Highlights and Plans

/T/

— Gross entitlement volumes produced from the Exploration, Rehabilitation,

Development Production Sharing Agreement (“ERDPSA”) averaged 865 bbl/d
for crude oil, 20.7 mmcf/d for natural gas or 4,309 boe/d for the first
quarter 2017. Production was impacted by the slower pace of executing
scheduled workovers due to limited availability of crane barges as well
as lower than expected post-workover production results.

— During the first quarter 2017, operating expenses at Bahar Energy

Operating Company (“BEOC”) were mainly in line with budget while capital
expenditures were significantly under budget as a result of capital
projects being reduced in scope or delayed.

— In the Gum Deniz Oil Field, BEOC completed five capital and ten service

workovers during the first quarter 2017.

— In the Bahar Gas Field, BEOC completed one capital workover during the

first quarter 2017. The Bahar-83 well was completed with an initial
production rate of 2.2 mmcf/d. Two additional gas workovers were
initiated and are expected to be completed in the second quarter 2017.

— In the first quarter 2017, BEOC continued progress on several

construction projects, including platform refurbishment, causeway
structure reinforcement and facility and health, safety and environment
(HS&E) upgrades. BEOC’s construction department performed the majority
of this work, eliminating the need for third party contractors, which
resulted in improved efficiency and lower costs.

— The dynamic reservoir model simulation studies continued for both the

Bahar and Gum Deniz fields and are expected to be completed in mid-2017.
The results of these simulation studies will enable more thorough
evaluation of development options in the Bahar and Gum Deniz fields. A
new plan of development will follow completion of the studies.

— On March 3, 2017, BEOC signed an amendment to the gas sales agreement

(the “Amended GSA”) for the sale of non-associated natural gas produced
under the ERDPSA with SOCAR, which took effect April 1, 2017.

/T/

The original gas sales agreement (the “Original GSA”) for the sale of
non-associated natural gas from the Bahar Gas Field expired on October 1, 2015.
Natural gas sales had continued on a month to month basis on the terms set
forth in the Original GSA while a revised gas sales agreement was negotiated
with SOCAR. Due to the continued difficult economic conditions in Azerbaijan,
SOCAR has placed pressure on all production sharing agreement holders to lower
prices for natural gas sold to SOCAR for domestic consumption. The Amended GSA
extends the term of the arrangement by 5 years and establishes a fixed natural
gas price of $95/mcm ($2.69/mcf), which is reduced from the natural gas price
of $140/mcm ($3.96/mcf) in the Original GSA.

In addition, the Amended GSA expands SOCAR’s obligation to purchase
non-associated natural gas. Under the terms of the Original GSA, SOCAR
purchased only non-associated natural gas from Bahar Gas Field. Under the terms
of the Amended GSA, SOCAR has agreed to purchase non-associated natural gas
from the entire ERDPSA area.

/T/

— On April 19, 2017 BEL and SOCAR signed a protocol in respect of the

carry of certain costs and related issues (the “Protocol”) which
addresses the shortfall by SOCAR Oil Affiliate (“SOA”) in funding its
20% share of project expenditures incurred under the ERDPSA since April
2014. In accordance with the Protocol, SOA’s 20% share of project
expenditures will be funded from SOA’s entitlement share of profit
petroleum revenues and revenues generated from the sale of SOCAR’s
compensatory petroleum. Any funding deficiencies in SOA’s cash call
payments will be borne by BEL and added to the outstanding Carry 1
balance which will subsequently be reimbursed in accordance with the
terms of the ERDPSA through payment of SOA’s share of cost recovery
petroleum revenues to BEL.

— For the remainder of 2017, BEOC will focus on increasing gas production

from the Bahar Gas Field through a series of recompletions of existing
wells to improve project cash flows. Additionally, BEOC is initiating
programs to further reduce field operating costs while maintaining HS&E
standards.

/T/

Selected Financial Information

Revenues and operating results in the “Selected Financial Information” have
been adjusted to reflect the Company’s share of BEL. Upon the closing of the
acquisition of Baghlan Group Limited’s 66.67% interest in BEL on August 9,
2016, BEL became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the Company began
consolidating 100% of the revenues and operating results from BEL on a going
forward basis. Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 presented in
the tables below have been adjusted to include the Company’s 33.33% share of
petroleum, natural gas and transportation revenues from BEL. Prior to the
acquisition, the Company’s share of BEL revenues was included in the income or
loss on Investment in Joint Venture under the equity method of accounting. The
combined financial and operating results have been presented only for
comparative purposes and do not reflect proper accounting practices under GAAP
for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Greenfields Petroleum Corporation

/T/

—————————————————————–

Three months ended
(US$000’s, except as noted) March 31,
2017 2016
—————————————————————–
Financial

Revenues 9,238 2,800
Net loss (1,368) (3,602)
Per share, basic and diluted ($0.01) ($0.16)

—————————————————————–
Capital items

Cash and cash equivalents 1,891 906
Total assets 198,781 97,220
Working capital (48,189) (14,345)
Debt and shareholders’ equity 138,147 53,990
—————————————————————–
—————————————————————–

/T/

Bahar Energy Limited

/T/

—————————————————————————-

Company’s share
—————————————-
(US$000’s, except as noted) Three months ended March 31,
—————————————-
2017 2016 2017 2016
—————————————————————————-
Financial

Revenues 9,238 7,399 9,238 2,466

—————————————————————————-
Operating

Average Entitlement Sales Volumes
(1)
Oil and condensate (bbl/d) 709 886 709 295
Natural gas (mcf/d) 17,296 13,629 17,296 4,543
Barrel oil equivalent (boe/d) 3,591 3,158 3,591 1,052

Average Oil Price
Oil price ($/bbl) $48.20 $30.84 $48.20 $30.84
Net realization price ($/bbl) $47.24 $29.99 $47.24 $29.99
Brent oil price ($/bbl) $53.59 $33.84 $53.59 $33.84

Natural gas price ($/mcf) $3.96 $3.96 $3.96 $3.96

—————————————————————————-
—————————————————————————-
(1) Daily volumes represent the Company’s share of the entitlement volumes
of the contractor parties to the ERDPSA net of compensatory petroleum and
the government’s share of profit petroleum. Compensatory petroleum
represents 10% of gross production and continues to be delivered until
specific cumulative petroleum and natural gas production milestones are
attained. Daily volumes for the three months ended March 31, 2016 include
the Company’s 33.33% share of BEL entitlement volumes and 100% of BEL’s
entitlement for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

/T/

About Greenfields Petroleum Corporation

Greenfields is a junior oil and natural gas company focused on the development
and production of proven oil and gas reserves principally in the Republic of
Azerbaijan. The Company plans to expand its oil and gas assets through further
farm-ins, and acquisitions of Production Sharing Agreements from foreign
governments containing previously discovered but under-developed international
oil and gas fields, also known as “greenfields”. More information about the
Company may be obtained on the Greenfields website at
www.greenfields-petroleum.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements. More particularly, this
press release includes forward-looking statements concerning, but not limited
to: operational and development plans; the completion of workovers and
anticipated timing thereof; the Protocol and the expectations in relation
thereto; the Bahar and Gum Deniz field studies and the expectations in relation
thereto; production; and programs initiated by BEOC. In addition, the use of
any of the words “initial, “scheduled”, “can”, “will”, “prior to”, “estimate”,
“anticipate”, “believe”, “should”, “future”, “continue”, “may”, “expect”, and
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements contained herein are based on certain key
expectations and assumptions made by the Company, including, but not limited
to, expectations and assumptions concerning the success of optimization and
efficiency improvement projects, the availability of capital, current
legislation and regulatory regimes, receipt of required regulatory approval,
the success of future drilling and development activities, the performance of
existing wells, the performance of new wells, general economic conditions,
availability of required equipment and services, weather conditions and
prevailing commodity prices. Although the Company believes that the
expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based
are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking
statements because the Company can give no assurance that they will prove to be
correct.

Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their
very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties most of which are
beyond the control of Greenfields. Should one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize, or should assumptions underlying the forward-looking
information prove incorrect, actual results, performance or achievements could
vary materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking
information. These risks include, but are not limited to, risks associated with
the oil and gas industry in general (e.g., operational risks in development,
exploration and production; delays or changes in plans with respect to
exploration or development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of
reserve estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to
production, costs and expenses; and health, safety, political and environmental
risks), commodity price and exchange rate fluctuations, changes in legislation
affecting the oil and gas industry and uncertainties resulting from potential
delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development projects
or capital expenditures. Additional risk factors can be found under the heading
“Risk Factors” in Greenfields’ Annual Information Form and similar headings in
the MD&A which may be viewed on www.sedar.com.

The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of
the date hereof and Greenfields undertakes no obligation to update publicly or
revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable
securities laws. The Company’s forward-looking information is expressly
qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement.

Abbreviations

/T/

bbls barrels mcf thousand cubic feet
bbls/d barrels per day mmcf million cubic feet
boe barrels of oil equivalent mcf/d thousand cubic feet per day
boe/d barrels of oil equivalent per mmcf/d million cubic feet per day
day
mcm million cubic meters

/T/

Notes to Oil and Gas Disclosures

Barrels of Oil Equivalent or “boe” may be misleading, particularly if used in
isolation. The volumes disclosed in this press release under the headings
“First Quarter 2017 Financial Results and Operating Highlights”, “Operating
Highlights and Plans” and “Selected Financial Information” use a 6mcf: 1boe, as
such is typically used in oil and gas reporting and is based on an energy
equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does
not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. The Company uses a 6mcf:
1boe ratio to calculate its share of entitlement sales from the Bahar project
for its financial reporting and reserves disclosure.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that
term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts
responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

– END RELEASE – 26/05/2017

For further information:
Greenfields Petroleum Corporation
John W. Harkins
Chief Executive Officer
(832) 234-0836
OR
A. Wayne Curzadd
Chief Financial Officer
(832) 234-0835
info@greenfieldspetroleum.com
www.greenfields-petroleum.com

COMPANY:
FOR: GREENFIELDS PETROLEUM CORPORATION
TSX VENTURE SYMBOL: GNF

INDUSTRY: Energy and Utilities – Oil and Gas
RELEASE ID: 20170526CC0060

Press Release from Marketwired 1-866-736-3779

All press releases are written by the client and have NO affiliation with the news copy written by The Canadian Press. Any questions that arise due to the content or information provided in the press release should be directed to the company/organization
issuing the release, not to The Canadian Press.

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Restructured and much smaller Penn West proposes name change to Obsidian Energy

CALGARY — Penn West Petroleum Ltd. (TSX:PWT) wants to change its name to Obsidian Energy Ltd. after surviving an accounting scandal, debt crisis and commodity price crash over the past three years.

David French, who took over as CEO of the Calgary oil and gas company in October, says shareholders will be asked to approve the change because the company no longer resembles the “old Penn West.”

In July 2014, Penn West announced that hundreds of millions of dollars in expenses had been improperly classified, forcing it to restate financial reports for 2012, 2013 and the first quarter of 2014.

The scandal resulted in class-action lawsuits by investors which were settled last year.

Meanwhile, the company embarked on a series of asset sales that allowed it to reduce net debt from almost $3 billion at the end of 2013 to $384 million as of March 31 this year.

Penn West is now a much smaller company with forecast production of 28,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day this year, down from 135,000 boepd in 2013. It also listed 407 employees at the end of 2016 versus 1,415 three years earlier.

The Canadian Press

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Ottawa won’t impose national threshold for electric car purchases, says Garneau

MONTREAL — Ottawa has appointed an advisory group to develop a plan for getting more zero-emission vehicles on the road, but it won’t follow Quebec in requiring automakers to sell a minimum number of electric cars, Transport Minister Marc Garneau said Friday.

“We just decided that instead of giving ourselves a specific number what we would do is try to make the conditions more favourable for people to buy zero-emissions vehicles,” he said in an interview at an electric vehicle show.

The job of the new 22-member panel, which includes industry and other stakeholders, is to come up with options by next year for addressing the barriers to zero-emission vehicles (ZEV), including vehicle supply, cost, infrastructure readiness and public awareness.

Quebec has the country’s only legislation requiring automakers to sell a minimum number of electric, plug-in hybrid and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. Starting with the 2018 model year, 3.5 per cent of all auto sales in the province will have to be from those types of vehicles. The threshold rises to 15.5 per cent for 2025.

Companies that don’t meet the targets will have to buy credits from other automakers that do.

Automakers say it will be very challenging to meet the threshold because electric vehicles make up only a sliver of the market. In Canada, just 0.56 per cent of vehicles sold last year were electric. Quebec’s rate is about one per cent.

David Adams, president of the Global Automakers of Canada and a member of the new federal advisory group, said the government’s unwillingness to set a national threshold on electric vehicles makes sense.

“Whether it’s Quebec or the federal government we don’t disagree with the objective of moving towards the decarbonization of transportation, we just maybe are at odds sometimes in terms of how quickly we can get there and what means,” he said, adding there are less costly ways to reduce transportation emissions than favouring one technology.

Pollution Probe CEO Ingrid Thompson said the appointment of the panel on which her group is a member is an important step.

“This is a very good day for clean air in Canada and climate,” she said from Toronto.

Garneau also wouldn’t say if Ottawa is prepared to offer a federal purchase rebate on top of the thousands of dollars that are available in some provinces.

“These are questions that we are going to look at in the course of the next year as this advisory council comes back to us and tells us what are the winning conditions to increase sale of zero-emissions vehicles,” he said.

Quebec Natural Resources Minister Pierre Arcand applauded Ottawa’s commitment to work with provinces to develop a realistic approach to increase ZEV sales, but said a national rebate should be introduced.

“Of course it would certainly help,” he said, adding that the challenge is also to entice purchases of more electric trucks, which pollute 11 times less than those powered by diesel.

Thompson said any discussion of federal rebates is premature before letting the advisory group do its work.

The federal government estimates that cars and light trucks accounted for 12 per cent of the country’s total emissions in 2015.

 

Ross Marowits, The Canadian Press

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Pipemakers in Regina vote to give union executive power to call strike

REGINA — Hundreds of unionized workers at Evraz North America’s steel plant in Regina have voted overwhelmingly in favour of strike action to back contract demands.

The vote by members of United Steelworkers Local 5890 took place Thursday at a special meeting to discuss the company’s contract proposals.

The union’s website says more than 99 per cent of the workers cast ballots in favour of job action.

The local said earlier this month that Evraz is proposing a five-year contract with no wage increases during the first three years, and a one-half-per-cent hike in the fourth and fifth years.

Union executives also said they would be applying for mediation in Calgary.

There was no immediate comment from Evraz on the outcome of the vote.

Kinder Morgan has said it plans to purchase about 250,000 tonnes of pipe for its Trans Mountain expansion from the Regina plant, with the material sourced from Evraz’s recycled metal operations in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario.

Kinder Morgan said the purchase amounts to more than 75 per cent of the pipe it needs for the project, and is equivalent to 800 km of line construction.

Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall has said Trans Mountain would help increase the value the province received for its oil because it would get it to the coast where it would gain access to world markets and better prices.

The Canadian Press

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Calgary Businesses Could benefit Significantly From Federal Supercluster Initiative

CALGARY – There’s good news for Calgary businesses this week, as the Government of Canada announced their supercluster initiative for matching funds to jumpstart innovation in high-growth business sectors. “Superclusters provide opportunity for small and medium sized businesses with innovative ideas and products to access global companies as partners and customers,” said Zoe Addington, Director of … Read more

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Canada is an International Leader in Methane Emissions Reductions: CAPP

FOR: CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM PRODUCERS (CAPP)
Date issue: May 26, 2017Time in: 10:36 AM eAttention:
CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – May 26, 2017) – The Canadian Association of
Petroleum Producers (CAPP) welcomes Environment and Climate Chan…

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Just Energy Marks 20 Years in the Retail Energy Space

FOR: JUST ENERGY GROUP INC.NYSE Symbol: JETSX Symbol: JEDate issue: May 26, 2017Time in: 8:45 AM eAttention:
HOUSTON, TX –(Marketwired – May 26, 2017) – Just Energy is excited to be
celebrating a milestone anniversary on May 26, 2017, as the indepen…

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

Razor Energy Corp. Announces Release of First Quarter 2017 Results and Executive Appointment

FOR: RAZOR ENERGY CORP.
TSX VENTURE SYMBOL: RZE

Date issue: May 26, 2017
Time in: 8:00 AM e

Attention:

CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – May 26, 2017) – Razor Energy Corp. (“Razor” or
the “Company”) (TSX VENTURE:RZE) (www.razor-energy.com) is pleased to announce
its first quarter 2017 financial and operating results. Selected financial and
operational information is outlined below and should be read in conjunction
with Razor’s unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and
management’s discussion and analysis for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 which
are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and the Company’s website.

The following tables summarize key financial and operating highlights
associated with the Company’s financial performance.

/T/

Three Months Ended
March 31,
($000’s unless otherwise stated) 2017 2016
—————————————————————————-
Production(1)
Oil (bbl/d) 2,032 –
Gas (mcf/d) 1,932 –
NGL (bbl/d) 721 –
—————————————————————————-
Total (boe/d) 3,075 –
—————————————————————————-
Oil and natural gas revenue
Oil and NGL sales 8,456 –
Natural gas sales 278 –
Other revenue 447 –
—————————————————————————-
Total revenue 9,181 –
—————————————————————————-
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic and
diluted) 10,048,376 –
Funds flow (2) 161 –
Funds flow per share (basic and diluted) 0.02 –
Net loss (1,829) –
Net loss per share (basic and diluted) (0.18) –
—————————————————————————-
Netback ($/boe)
Oil and gas sales 48.14 –
Other revenues 2.46 –
—————————————————————————-
Revenue 50.60
Royalty 9.04 –
Operating expenses 30.92 –
—————————————————————————-
Operating netback (2) 10.64 –
General and administrative costs 3.20 –
Acquisition and transaction costs 5.38 –
Interest expense 2.68 –
—————————————————————————-
Corporate netback (2) (0.62) –
—————————————————————————-
Capital expenditures 979 –
Net assets acquired 17,089 –
—————————————————————————-
—————————————————————————-
1) Production for 2017 represents the average daily production for the 59
days from February 1 to March 31, 2017.
2) Refer to “Non-IFRS measures”.

March 31, December 31,
($000’s) 2017 2016
—————————————————————————-
Total assets 103,056 83
Cash 9,526 8
Long-term debt (principal) 30,000 –
Net debt (1) 19,906 442
—————————————————————————-
—————————————————————————-
1) Refer to “Non-IFRS measures”.

/T/

HIGHLIGHTS

First Quarter 2017

/T/

— On January 31, completed a business combination with Vector Resources

Inc., including the name change to Razor Energy Corp., and a common
share consolidation of 20:1;
— Secured financing through a term loan facility of $30 million with the
Alberta Investment Management Corporation (“AIMCo”);
— Acquired producing light oil and gas assets in the Swan Hills area of
Alberta for $17.1 million, subject to customary adjustments;
— Average production of 3,075 boe/day (90% liquids) in the Swan Hills area
for the 59 day period between closing and March 31; and
— Expended $979,000 of capital primarily on well reactivations and
workovers.

/T/

Subsequent to First Quarter 2017

/T/

— Closed a common share equity financing for gross proceeds of $17.25

million; and
— Acquired light oil and gas assets in the Kaybob area of Alberta for $9.6
million, subject to customary adjustments.

/T/

EXECUTIVE APPOINTMENT

The Company is pleased to announce the appointment of Lisa Mueller to the
position of Vice President, New Ventures effective immediately. Ms. Mueller
adds significant engineering, commercial, and business development experience
to the Razor team. In her executive capacity, she will identify and develop
opportunities within the Company’s existing operations to augment hydrocarbon
production efficiencies and unlock value from other resources within our asset
portfolio.

ABOUT RAZOR

Razor is a light oil focused company operating predominantly in Alberta.
Razor’s full-cycle business plan provides an opportunity to reposition the
Company as a disciplined and high-growth junior E&P company. With an
experienced management team and a strong, committed Board of Directors, growth
is anticipated to occur through timely strategic acquisitions and operations.
Razor currently trades on TSX Venture Exchange under the ticker “RZE”.

READER ADVISORIES

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This press release may contain certain statements
that may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Such statements relate to
possible future events. All statements other than statements of historical fact
may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are often, but
not always, identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “believe”,
“will”, “should”, “may”, and similar expressions. The forward-looking
statements are based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by the
Company, including but not limited to expectations and assumptions concerning
the availability of capital, current legislation, receipt of required
regulatory approval, the success of future drilling and development activities,
the performance of existing wells, the performance of new wells, the Company’s
growth strategy, general economic conditions, availability of required
equipment and services and prevailing commodity prices. Although the Company
believes that the expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking
statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the
forward-looking statements because the Company can give no assurance that they
will prove to be correct. Since forward-looking statements address future
events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently
anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These include, but are not
limited to, risks associated with the oil and gas industry in general (e.g.,
operational risks in development, exploration and production; delays or changes
in plans with respect to exploration or development projects or capital
expenditures; as the uncertainty of reserve estimates; the uncertainty of
estimates and projections relating to production, costs and expenses, and
health, safety and environmental risks), commodity price and exchange rate
fluctuations, changes in legislation affecting the oil and gas industry and
uncertainties resulting from potential delays or changes in plans with respect
to exploration or development projects or capital expenditures. Please refer to
the risk factors identified in the annual information form and management
discussion and analysis of the Company which is available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release
are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to
update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so
required by applicable securities laws.

NON-IFRS MEASURES: This press release contains the terms “funds flow”, “net
debt”, “operating netback” and “corporate netback”, which do not have
standardized meanings prescribed by International Financial Reporting Standards
(“IFRS”) and therefore may not be comparable with the calculation of similar
measures by other companies. Funds flow represents cash flow from operating
activities before changes in non-cash working capital and decommissioning
expenditures. Management uses funds flow to analyze operating performance and
leverage. Net debt is calculated as the principal amount of long-term debt less
working capital (or plus working capital deficiency), with working capital
excluding mark-to-market risk management contracts. Management believes net
debt is a useful supplemental measure of the total amount of current and
long-term debt of the Company. Operating netback equals total petroleum and
natural gas sales less royalties and operating costs calculated on a boe basis.
Razor considers operating netback as an important measure to evaluate its
operational performance as it demonstrates its field level profitability
relative to current commodity prices. Corporate netback is calculated by
deducting general & administration costs, acquisition and transaction costs,
and interest from operating netback all calculated on a boe basis. Razor
considers corporate netback as an important measure to evaluate its overall
corporate performance.

ADVISORY PRODUCTION INFORMATION: Unless otherwise indicated herein, all
production information presented herein has presented on a gross basis, which
is the Company’s working interest prior to deduction of royalties and without
including any royalty interests.

BARRELS OF OIL EQUIVALENT: The term “boe” or barrels of oil equivalent may be
misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six
thousand cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent (6 Mcf: 1
bbl) is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable
at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Additionally, given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude
oil, as compared to natural gas, is significantly different from the energy
equivalency of 6:1; utilizing a conversion ratio of 6:1 may be misleading as an
indication of value.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that
term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts
responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

– END RELEASE – 26/05/2017

For further information:
Doug Bailey
President and Chief Executive Officer
OR
Kevin Braun
Chief Financial Officer
OR
Razor Energy Corp.
1250, 645 7th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4G8
(403) 262-0242
www.razor-energy.com

COMPANY:
FOR: RAZOR ENERGY CORP.
TSX VENTURE SYMBOL: RZE

INDUSTRY: Energy and Utilities – Oil and Gas
RELEASE ID: 20170526CC0012

Press Release from Marketwired 1-866-736-3779

All press releases are written by the client and have NO affiliation with the news copy written by The Canadian Press. Any questions that arise due to the content or information provided in the press release should be directed to the company/organization
issuing the release, not to The Canadian Press.

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE

 

WesternZagros Announces First Quarter 2017 Operational and Financial Results

FOR: WESTERNZAGROS RESOURCES LTD.
TSX VENTURE SYMBOL: WZR

Date issue: May 26, 2017
Time in: 7:30 AM e

Attention:

CALGARY, ALBERTA–(Marketwired – May 26, 2017) –

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED
STATES

WesternZagros Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:WZR) (“WesternZagros” or “the
Company”) announced today its operating and financial results for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2017. All amounts set out in this news release are in
US dollars unless otherwise stated.

Commenting on the first quarter results and subsequent events, WesternZagros’s
Chief Executive Officer Simon Hatfield said:

“The leading news this quarter is of course our agreement with Crest to take
WesternZagros private. Given the current market conditions, the Crest offer
represents a significant premium to the share price at the time of the offer.
The Company encourages shareholders to take advantage of this offer.”

WesternZagros achieved several key financial and operational milestones during
the first quarter 2017 and to date, including:

/T/

— Corporate – On May 12, 2017, the Company entered into a definitive

agreement (“Arrangement Agreement”) with its largest shareholder, Crest
Energy International LLC (“Crest”) to take the Company private. Pursuant
to the Arrangement Agreement, an affiliate of Crest will provide the
Company with funds necessary to acquire all of the Company’s outstanding
common and preferred shares for CAD$0.28 per share, other than one
common share held by Crest which will be acquired by such Crest
affiliate. The transaction is to be completed by way of a plan of
arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta). The
shareholder meeting to approve the transaction is scheduled for July 5,
2017 and following a positive outcome at the meeting, is expected to
close in early July 2017.

— Financial – The Company ended the quarter with $22.5 million in cash and

cash equivalents.

Concurrent with the Arrangement Agreement, WesternZagros entered into a
bridge loan agreement with the same Crest affiliate pursuant to which
the Company has received funding of $30 million (the “Bridge Loan’) to
address its immediate financing requirements. In connection with
entering into the Arrangement Agreement and the funding of the Bridge
Loan, WesternZagros and Crest entered into an agreement to terminate the
prior undrawn $200 million credit facility dated August 14, 2014.

— Production – First quarter gross oil sales from the Sarqala field

averaged 4,942 barrels of light oil per day (“bbl/d”), of which
WesternZagros’s net oil sales were 1,333 bbl/d. Following the completion
of a planned acid stimulation completed at the end of March, the
Sarqala-1 well is currently producing at approximately 6,900 bbl/d.

— Revenue – Revenue recognized by WesternZagros during the first quarter

was $5.1 million with an average realized price of $42.83/bbl.
Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company received payment for all
remaining first quarter revenues, with no remaining outstanding
receivables for first quarter revenue.

— Garmian Development – The first Garmian development well has been

approved by the co-venturers and is expected to spud in July 2017 with a
budgeted net cost to WesternZagros of $18 to 22 million. This is the
Company’s first Garmian well located with the benefit of 3D seismic data
and is designed as a producing well for the Jeribe reservoir. The co-
venturers have also approved a facilities work program for 2017 in order
to debottleneck and expand the Sarqala production facility to an initial
estimated capacity of 10,000 bbl/d and then to further increase to an
estimated 15,000 bbl/d capacity by the end of the year.

— Kurdamir Development – WesternZagros and Repsol continue to advance

discussions with the KRG on finalizing the approval of the Kurdamir
Development Plan. The major outstanding matter is the finalization of
the gas sales agreement for phase 1 gas volumes applicable to the
Kurdamir project and the adjacent Topkhana project. The two projects are
to be developed concurrently with the sharing of top side facilities to
optimize capital costs.

— Impairment of E&E Expenditures – The Arrangement Agreement entered into

with Crest subsequent to the reporting date, providing for the
acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of the Company, presented
evidence that an indicator of impairment existed for exploration and
evaluation expenditures as at March 31, 2017. Based on the total
acquisition price, the estimated recoverable amount associated with the
Kurdamir Block was determined to be $20.8 million which resulted in the
recognition of a non-cash impairment loss of $254.1 million for the
first quarter of 2017. Refer to the section entitled “Impairment of E&E
Expenditures” in the Company’s MD&A dated May 25, 2017 for further
description.

/T/

First Quarter 2017 Results

WesternZagros has posted its operating and financial results for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2017 on its website. The financial statements, the
Management Discussion and Analysis, and the Annual Information Form are
available at www.westernzagros.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Outlook

WesternZagros continues to focus on advancing development in accordance with
the approved Garmian FDP and securing KRG approval of the phased development
plan for the Kurdamir Block in line with market conditions and dependent upon
the sustainability of regular payments for production.

Following the successful acidization workover, the Company anticipates the
average daily productive capacity of Sarqala-1 will range from 6,850 to 10,000
bbl/d for the remainder of 2017. Assuming continuous production and payments
for the year, and an average Brent price of $50 to $55 per barrel,
WesternZagros estimates 2017 revenues of $24 to $33 million.

The Company has $22.5 million in cash and cash equivalents as at March 31,
2017, plus the Bridge Loan proceeds of $30 million received subsequent to March
31, 2017, to advance the field development plans with its co-venturers. The
Company continues its focus on strict cost management and estimates spending of
approximately $48 million for the remainder of 2017 to operate the Sarqala
production operations, advance the currently approved work programs of the
Garmian and Kurdamir blocks with its co-venturers and fund WesternZagros head
office costs. The first Garmian development well has been approved by the
co-venturers and is expected to spud in July 2017 with a budgeted net cost to
WesternZagros of $18 to 22 million. This is the Company’s first Garmian well
located with the benefit of 3D seismic data and is designed as a producing well
for the Jeribe reservoir. The co-venturers have also approved a facilities work
program for 2017 in order to debottleneck and expand the Sarqala production
facility to an initial estimated capacity of 10,000 bbl/d and then to further
increase to an estimated 15,000 bbl/d capacity by the end of the year and with
an estimated cost net to the Company of $6 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at March 31, 2017, WesternZagros had $22.5 million in cash and cash
equivalents. Subsequent to March 31, 2017, the Company received $30 million in
proceeds under the Bridge Loan concurrent with entering into the Arrangement
Agreement with Crest.

The Company’s remaining 2017 capital budget is estimated to be approximately
$48 million, including the Sarqala-2 well which has now been approved by the
Garmian Block co-venturers. However, the development plan for the Kurdamir
Block has not yet been approved by the KRG and the Company will continue to
evaluate, monitor and assess relevant factors which may impact anticipated
future capital requirements and spending, including the following:

/T/

— The results of the shareholder vote and other conditions to closing

under the Arrangement Agreement;
— The ability to access other sources of funding for development
activities in the Kurdistan Region, if required;
— The expected timing and scope of development activities based upon an
appropriate phasing reflective of the approved development plans,
current market conditions, and the political and security situation
within Iraq;
— The ability to export or to sell oil and natural gas in accordance with
the economic terms of the PSCs;
— The level of cash flow generated from sales of crude oil and stability
of payments;
— The continued participation of its co-venturers in development
activities;
— The current conditions of the oil and gas industry given the continued
volatility in world oil prices and its impact on further investment in
the industry and the Kurdistan Region;
— The timing for repayment of the Bridge Loan; and
— The current conditions in the financial markets, including the potential
for further market instability;

/T/

With the existing capital resources on hand, including the proceeds from the
Bridge Loan and expected revenue, the Company anticipates that it is fully
funded for currently planned activities for the next twelve months. However,
additional funding may be required by the Company in the future. The quantum
of, and timing for, such funding will be dependent upon the factors identified
above, and particularly the outcome of the negotiations and final approvals of
the Kurdamir FDP. The Company may delay certain phases of its development plans
if the ability to export or sell into the domestic market oil and natural gas,
and receive timely payment therefor, in accordance with the economic terms of
the PSCs is restricted, unavailable or uncertain, or if the political and
security situation within Iraq is not suitable. If the Arrangement Agreement
entered into with Crest is not completed for any reason, the sources for any
required additional funding may include potentially accessing the debt and/or
equity markets or seeking additional partnerships, farmouts or other strategic
arrangements.

About WesternZagros Resources Ltd.

WesternZagros is an international natural resources company focused on
acquiring properties and exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and
natural gas in Iraq. WesternZagros, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
holds a 40 percent working interest in two Production Sharing Contracts with
the Kurdistan Regional Government in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
WesternZagros’s shares trade in Canada on the TSX Venture Exchange under the
symbol “WZR”.

This news release certain forward-looking statements relating to, but not
limited to, anticipated capital and other commitments and the timing thereof,
expectations regarding the necessity for further funding and the timing and
potential sources thereof, operational information, development plans,
anticipated capacity of facilities, expected production rates, revenues and
petroleum costs (as defined in each PSC), statements regarding the plan of
arrangement under the Arrangement Agreement (the “Arrangement”) and the
anticipated timing for holding the required shareholder meeting and completing
the Arrangement. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with
words such as “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “potential”, “could”, or
similar words suggesting future outcomes. The Company cautions readers and
prospective investors in the Company’s securities to not place undue reliance
on forward-looking information as, by its nature, it is based on current
expectations regarding future events that involve a number of assumptions,
inherent risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ
materially from those anticipated by WesternZagros.

Forward looking information is not based on historical facts but rather on
management’s current expectations as well as assumptions made by, and
information currently available to management, concerning, among other things,
development plans, future capital and other expenditures (including the timing,
amount, nature and sources of funding thereof), the outcomes of future well
operations, drilling activity and testing, the installation and commissioning
of facilities, the ability to access financing as required, the continued
ability to sell production in the domestic or export markets and the quantum
and timing of payments to be received in connection therewith, anticipated
operating costs, future economic conditions, future currency and exchange
rates, continued political stability, continued security in the Kurdistan
Region, timely receipt of any necessary co-venturer, government or regulatory
approvals, the successful resolution of any disputes, the Company’s continued
ability to employ qualified staff and the continued participation of the
Company’s co-venturers in joint activities. In addition, budgets are based upon
WesternZagros’s current development plans and anticipated costs, both of which
are subject to change based on, among other things, the outcome of negotiations
with co-venturers and the government, the actual outcomes of well operations,
drilling activity and testing and the installation and commissioning of
facilities, unexpected delays, availability of future financing and changes in
market conditions. Although the Company believes the expectations and
assumptions reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, they
may prove to be incorrect. Forward-looking information involves significant
known and unknown risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by WesternZagros
including, but not limited to, risks associated with the oil and gas industry
(e.g. operational risks in development and production; inherent uncertainties
in interpreting geological data; changes in plans with respect to capital
expenditures; interruptions in operations together with any associated
insurance proceedings; the uncertainty of estimates and projections in relation
to timing, costs and expenses and health, safety and environmental risks), the
risk of commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, risks relating
to the ability to access the export or domestic markets and to receive payments
in accordance with the PSC terms on a timely basis, risks relating to the
ability to access financing as and when needed, the uncertainty associated with
any dispute resolution proceedings, the uncertainty associated with negotiating
with foreign governments and the risk associated with international activity,
including the lack of federal petroleum legislation, ongoing political disputes
and recent terrorist activities in Iraq in particular.

In respect of the forward-looking statements and information concerning the
completion of the Arrangement and the anticipated timing for completion of the
Arrangement, WesternZagros has provided such in reliance on certain assumptions
that it believes are reasonable at this time, including assumptions as to the
time required to prepare and mail meeting materials, the ability of the parties
to receive, in a timely manner and on satisfactory terms, the necessary
regulatory, court, shareholder, TSX Venture Exchange and other third party
approvals and the ability of the parties to satisfy, in a timely manner, the
other conditions to the completion of the Arrangement. These dates may change
for a number of reasons, including unforeseen delays in preparing meeting
materials; inability to secure necessary shareholder, regulatory, court or
other third party approvals in the time assumed or the need for additional time
to satisfy the other conditions to the completion of the Arrangement. Risks and
uncertainties that may cause such differences include but are not limited to:
the risk that the Arrangement may not be completed on a timely basis, if at
all; the conditions to the consummation of the Arrangement may not be
satisfied; the risk that the Arrangement may involve unexpected costs,
liabilities or delays; the possibility that legal proceedings may be instituted
against WesternZagros and/or others relating to the Arrangement and the outcome
of such proceedings; the possible occurrence of an event, change or other
circumstance that could result in termination of the Arrangement; risks
relating to the failure to obtain necessary shareholder and court approval;
other risks inherent in the oil and gas industry. Failure to obtain the
requisite approvals, or the failure of the parties to otherwise satisfy the
conditions to or complete the Arrangement, may result in the Arrangement not
being completed on the proposed terms, or at all. In addition, if the
Arrangement is not completed, the announcement of the Arrangement and the
dedication of substantial resources of WesternZagros to the completion of the
Arrangement could have a material adverse impact on WesternZagros’s share
price, its current business relationships and on the current and future
operations, financial condition and prospects of WesternZagros.

Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of important factors is not
exhaustive and that these factors and risks are difficult to predict. The
forward-looking statements contained in this news release are made as of the
date of this news release and, except as required by law, WesternZagros does
not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the
included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise. The forward-looking statements contained in this
news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. See the
“Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Information Form (“AIF”) dated
March 14, 2017 filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com for a further description of
these risks and uncertainties facing WesternZagros. Additional information
relating to WesternZagros is also available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com,
including the Company’s AIF.

Non-IFRS Measures

Field netback is a non-IFRS measure that represents the Company’s working
interest share of oil sales, after deducting royalties and operating expenses.
Management believes that the field netback is a useful measure to analyze
operating performance and provides an indication of the Company’s results of
business activities prior to other income and expenses. Field netback does not
have a standard meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar
measures used by other companies. It should not be considered in isolation or
as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS
such as total income (loss) or cash flow from (used in) operating activities.
See the “Financial Performance” section of the Company’s MD&A dated May 25,
2017 for a reconciliation of field netback.

Reserves and Resources Advisory

In addition, statements relating to reserves and other resources contained
herein are deemed to be forward-looking statements, as they involve the implied
assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions that the resources
described can be economically produced in the future. Future net revenue values
are estimated values only and do not represent fair market value. There is no
assurance that the forecast prices and cost assumptions, the initial phases of
the development plans as submitted to the KRG and anticipated future phases
contemplated in completing the full field development utilized in such
estimated values will be attained and variances could be material. The reserve
and resource estimates provided herein are estimates only and there is no
assurance that the estimated reserves and other resources will be recovered.
Actual reserves and other resources may be greater than or less than the
estimates provided herein. Terms related to resource classifications referred
to herein are based on the definitions and guidelines in the Canadian Oil and
Gas Evaluation Handbook which are as follows. The reserves have been evaluated
by Sproule International Limited (“Sproule”). Resources other than reserves
have been estimated by the Company and audited by Sproule.

“Reserves” are estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and
related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, as
of a given date, based on (a) analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and
engineering data, (b) the use of established technology and (c) specified
economic conditions which are generally accepted as being reasonable and shall
be disclosed. Reserves are classified as Proved, Probable or Possible according
to the degree of certainty associated with the estimates. “Proved Reserves” are
those Reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be
recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will
exceed the estimated Proved Reserves. If probabilistic methods are used, there
should be at least a 90 percent probability that the quantities actually
recovered will equal or exceed the estimated Proved Reserves. “Probable
Reserves” are those additional Reserves that are less certain to be recovered
than Proved Reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities
recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated Proved plus
Probable (2P) Reserves. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at
least a 50 percent probability that the quantities actually recovered will
equal or exceed the sum of the estimated 2P Reserves. “Possible Reserves” are
those additional Reserves that are less certain to be recovered than Probable
Reserves. It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will
exceed the sum of the estimated Proved plus Probable plus Possible (3P)
Reserves. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10
percent probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed
the sum of the estimated 3P Reserves.

“Contingent Resources” are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a
given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using
established technology or technology under development, but which are not
currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more
contingencies. Contingent Resources have an associated chance of development
(economic, regulatory, market and facility, corporate commitment or political
risks). The Contingent Resources estimates referred to herein have not been
risked for the chance of development. There is no certainty that the Contingent
Resources will be developed and, if developed, there is no certainty as to the
timing of such development or that it will be commercially viable to produce
any portion of the Contingent Resources.

“Prospective Resources” are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a
given date, to be potentially recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by
application of future development projects. Prospective Resources have both an
associated chance of discovery (geological chance of success) and a chance of
development (economic, regulatory, market, facility, corporate commitment or
political risks). The chance of commerciality is the product of these two risk
components. Unless otherwise indicated, the estimates referred to herein have
not been risked for either the chance of discovery or the chance of
development. There is no certainty that any portion of the Prospective
Resources will be discovered. If a discovery is made, there is no certainty
that it will be developed or, if it is developed, there is no certainty as to
the timing of such development or that it will be commercially viable to
produce any portion of the Prospective Resources.

Gross Block resource estimates presented herein represent the total volumes for
the indicated reservoirs attributable to 100 percent of the relevant block,
without any adjustment for the Company’s working interest therein whereas the
Working Interest (Gross) or Company Gross resource estimates presented
represent the Company’s 40 percent working interest (operating or
non-operating) share before deduction of royalty petroleum, profit petroleum,
production bonuses and capacity building support payments pursuant to the
provisions of the applicable Production Sharing Contract.

Best Estimate (P50) or (2C) is considered to be the best estimate of the
quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will be greater of less than the best estimate.
If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50 percent
probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the
best estimate.

A barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) is determined by converting a volume of
natural gas to barrels using the ratio of 6 thousand cubic feet (Mcf) to one
barrel. BOEs may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A BOE
conversion ratio of 6 Mcf:1 BOE is based on an energy equivalency conversion
method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value
equivalency at the wellhead. Given that the value ratio based on the current
price of oil as compared to natural gas is significantly different from the
energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be
misleading as an indication of value.

The section “Statement of Reserves and Other Oil and Gas Information”
(including Schedule A) contained in the Company’s AIF dated March 14, 2017
filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, contains additional detail with respect to the
Company’s resource assessments and the estimates of net present value
associated with its Reserves. This section includes the significant risks and
uncertainties associated with the volume estimates and the recovery and
development of the resources, the forecast prices and cost assumptions,
descriptions of the applicable projects and FDPs and the specific contingencies
which prevent the classification of the Contingent Resources as Reserves.
As indicated above, unless otherwise indicated, the estimates of Contingent
Resources and Prospective Resources contained in this document are presented on
an unrisked basis. Readers should refer to the AIF for the associated risked
estimates of Contingent Resources and Prospective Resources. Such risked
estimates are based upon the Company’s estimates of chance of commerciality set
forth therein which involves assessing various risks based upon a number of
assumptions and other factors. While the Company believes that such estimates
and underlying assumptions are reasonable, many of these assumptions are beyond
the Company’s control, are subject to change and may not, over time, prove to
be accurate. As such, the actual level of various risks (including those
currently identified and additional risks which may be identified in the
future) could prove to be greater and the chance of commerciality lower than
currently estimated and such differences could be material.

NEITHER THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT
TERM IS DEFINED IN POLICIES OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY
FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE

– END RELEASE – 26/05/2017

For further information:
WesternZagros
Tony Kraljic
Senior VP Finance
(403) 693-7011
OR
WesternZagros
Lisa Harriman
Manager of Corporate Communications and Administration
(403) 693-7017
investorrelations@westernzagros.com
www.westernzagros.com

COMPANY:
FOR: WESTERNZAGROS RESOURCES LTD.
TSX VENTURE SYMBOL: WZR

INDUSTRY: Energy and Utilities – Oil and Gas
RELEASE ID: 20170526CC0004

Press Release from Marketwired 1-866-736-3779

All press releases are written by the client and have NO affiliation with the news copy written by The Canadian Press. Any questions that arise due to the content or information provided in the press release should be directed to the company/organization
issuing the release, not to The Canadian Press.

GET ENERGYNOW’S DAILY EMAIL FOR FREE